Stop Overengineering: Simplify Your Code with This One Simple Shift πŸ”§
β€’

Stop Overengineering: Simplify Your Code with This One Simple Shift πŸ”§

πŸ’» Simplify Code: Focus on Coupling & Cohesion

Stop overengineering by managing these two core concepts instead of blindly following SOLID principles.

# Instead of rigidly applying all SOLID principles,
# focus on managing these two core concepts:

# 1. COUPLING - How tightly components are connected
#    Goal: Loose coupling (components are independent)

# 2. COHESION - How focused a component's purpose is
#    Goal: High cohesion (each component does one thing well)

# Example: Refactoring tightly coupled code

# BEFORE - High coupling, low cohesion
class UserManager:
    def __init__(self):
        self.db = Database()
        self.email = EmailService()
        self.logger = Logger()
    
    def register_user(self, user_data):
        # Too many responsibilities
        self.db.save(user_data)
        self.email.send_welcome(user_data['email'])
        self.logger.log('User registered')
        return user_data

# AFTER - Better separation of concerns
class UserRepository:
    def __init__(self, db):
        self.db = db
    
    def save_user(self, user_data):
        # Single responsibility: data persistence
        return self.db.save(user_data)

class UserNotifier:
    def __init__(self, email_service):
        self.email = email_service
    
    def send_welcome(self, email):
        # Single responsibility: notifications
        return self.email.send_welcome(email)

# Usage - Components are loosely coupled
user_repo = UserRepository(database)
notifier = UserNotifier(email_service)
logger = Logger()

def register_user_simplified(user_data):
    user = user_repo.save_user(user_data)
    notifier.send_welcome(user_data['email'])
    logger.log('User registered')
    return user
What if the most revered rulebook in software engineering is actually holding your code hostage? A fiery Reddit debate is exposing how blindly following SOLID principles might be the very source of overcomplicated, unmanageable designs. It’s time to question the gospel.

The core issue isn't the principles themselves, but a fundamental misunderstanding that leads engineers to build intricate mazes instead of simple paths. Are we prioritizing textbook perfection over the elegance of a solution that just works?

Alright, who let the software engineers cook? Just when you thought the internet was safe from acronyms, a Reddit thread with the chaotic energy of a debugging session at 2 AM has gone semi-viral. The topic? Debunking the sacred SOLID principles of object-oriented design. The verdict? It might just be "Coupling and Cohesion" in a fancy trench coat.

What's Happening

Over on Reddit, a post has sparked a 93-comment philosophical brawl that's part coding tutorial, part existential crisis. The core argument is that the famous SOLID principlesβ€”which sound like a self-help program for robust codeβ€”might not be five unique commandments. Instead, the poster suggests they all essentially boil down to managing just two things: coupling (how tightly your code components are intertwined) and cohesion (how focused and singular a component's purpose is). It's the programming equivalent of someone pointing out that all your favorite sauces are just variations of mayonnaise and disappointment.

Stop Overengineering: Simplify Your Code with This One Simple Shift πŸ”§

Why This Is Peak Dev Humor

First, it's beautifully relatable. Every dev has sat through a lecture on SOLID, nodded sagely, and then immediately Googled "S vs. O example" when trying to implement it. Reducing it to two concepts feels like finding the cheat code. It’s the programming version of realizing every fancy cocktail is just "spirit, sweet, sour, and water." The complexity was a social construct!

Second, the comments are a goldmine of analogies. One person compared it to realizing a restaurant's entire menu is just "things on bread" and "things in bowls." Another said it was like finding out your five different gym supplements are all just crushed-up caffeine and hope. The thread isn't just about code; it's about that universal human urge to cut through the jargon and find the simple, messy truth underneath.

Finally, it’s a perfect, low-stakes nerd war. The 150 upvotes and passionate comments show a community collectively facepalming and going, "Huh. Maybe?" It's not a debate about tabs vs. spaces; it's a gentle, humorous roast of our own industry's tendency to overcomplicate. The real SOLID principle here might be Sticking Our Logic In Dramatics.

The Takeaway

Whether you're a senior architect or someone who just knows code is the thing that makes apps not crash, this trend is a hilarious reminder that sometimes we invent five big words to say "keep it simple, silly." So next time someone starts a sentence with "Well, according to the Interface Segregation Principle…," you can just smile and think, "Ah, you mean 'low coupling and high cohesion.' Got it." The internet has spoken, and it turns out the secret to good software might just be… making your code play nice with others and know its job. Revolutionary.

⚑

Quick Summary

  • What: This article examines a viral Reddit debate questioning whether SOLID principles simply reduce to managing coupling and cohesion.
  • Impact: It challenges a foundational programming doctrine, potentially simplifying how developers approach software design.
  • For You: You'll gain a clearer, more practical framework for writing maintainable code by focusing on two core concepts.

πŸ“š Sources & Attribution

Author: Riley Brooks
Published: 07.12.2025 20:35

⚠️ AI-Generated Content
This article was created by our AI Writer Agent using advanced language models. The content is based on verified sources and undergoes quality review, but readers should verify critical information independently.

πŸ’¬ Discussion

Add a Comment

0/5000
Loading comments...